Burger King, a prominent name in the fast-food sector, has captured attention by announcing the cIosure of a substantial number of its U.S. outlets. This bold move, driven by a combination of internal and external factors, reflects the fast-food giant’s commitment to reshape its operations.
By diving into the intricacies of this decision and expIoring the broader context of the company’s efforts to redefine its brand, it becomes evident that Burger King is embarking on a transformative journey in the competitive realm of fast food.
Strategic Rationalization of Burger King’s Outlets
The strategy of closing restaurants is not unfamiliar to Burger King. CEO Joshua Kobza’s recognition of the company’s annual practice of shuttering a certain number of outlets emphasizes its ongoing dedication to optimaI performance.
However, the announcement of closing around 400 U.S. locations represents a more deliberate and significant step.
Chairman Patrick Doyle’s assertion that franchisees unable to consistently meet the system’s performance standards will be phased out underscores Burger King’s commitment to operational excellence.
This strategic pruning of underperforming outlets enabIes Burger King to allocate resources towards enhancing profitable establishments, thereby elevating overall performance and brand reputation.
The Rebranding and Modernization Strategy
This move aligns with Burger King’s broader rebranding strategy and effort to fortify its standing in the competitive fast-food landscape.
Acknowledging challenges like stagnant sales and intensified competition, the company launched the ambitious “Reclaim the Flame” rebranding campaign in 2022, backed by a $400 million investment. This comprehensive approach encompasses revamped advertising, menu streamIining, and extensive restaurant makeovers, all aimed at revitalizing the brand’s appeal.
Burger King’s commitment to modernization is further exemplified by allocating $50 million over the next two years to revamp nearly 3,000 outlets.
These upgrades involve technological enhancements, kitchen advancements, and physical renovations, all designed to eIevate the customer experience. Innovations such as three-lane drive-thrus and advanced delivery mechanisms cater to modern preferences, positioning Burger King as a relevant and competitive player.
Drew Barrymore and her grandfather’s friend Vincent Price together in 1984…Check c,o,m,m,e,n,t,s below
Even though there are dozens of different experts that work on the appearances of characters in movies, they aren’t immune to making mistakes. And in the end, viewers may catch these fails in makeup or costume choices that couldn’t have possibly existed during the time in which the movie was set.
We at Bright Side decided to watch some of our favorite movies and read some fashion history books to find the mistakes makeup artists and costume designers have made in popular films.
Gone with the Wind
No matter how trendy Scarlett O’Hara was, she couldn’t have predicted the clothing trends for decades in advance. Her famous slim-fitting red dress with feathers and rhinestones has nothing to do with Civil War fashion — it was inspired more by styles from the 1930s and 1940s.
Julius Caesar
In the 1953 film, most of the female characters wore extravagant bullet bras. In Ancient Rome, women would wear a strophium, a prototype for the modern bra, but these weren’t bullet bras.
Legends of the Fall
Trying to create a romantic look, costume designers ignored the historical facts. Brad Pitt’s character has beautiful blonde hair and facial hair but these things were unacceptable for the time period. More and more men were choosing to don big mustaches and short hair at this time.
King Arthur
The film, which is set in the fifth century, portrays knights in heavy metal armor. But until the fourteenth century, such armor was made of leather, and only mail armor was made of metal.
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
The film is about events that happened in the ’90s and the clothes look pretty accurate, however, they’re still not perfect. Dudley Dursley is wearing G-Unit shorts — a brand that was created by 50 Cent in 2003.
Hello, Dolly!
The movie is set in New York at the end of the nineteenth century when such a hairstyle, lip gloss, and eye makeup didn’t exist. But the movie still got 3 Oscars and became one of the most important films of the decade.
Queen Margot
Throughout the entire film, the characters are wearing beautiful dresses with open shoulders. They look great but in the sixteenth century, women never ignored shifts (or chemise in French). These pieces of clothing protected them from the cold, absorbed sweat, and were really easy to wash.
Another mistake costume designers made was the way the main character’s hair was let down. Based on the few portraits we have of Margaret of Valois, she had curly hair that she wore up.
The Danish Girl
The Danish Girl starts in 1926 but in the first half of the film, we see women in slim-fitting clothes that have nothing to do with the fashion of the 1920s.
At the beginning of the film, Gerda has a hairstyle that was actually quite outdated for the setting that favored waved or bobbed hair.
A Dangerous Method
In one scene, Keira Knightley appears only in her corset, which is a contradiction to the original rules that came along with wearing this piece of clothing. A woman would never wear a corset alone.
Bonus: Mary Queen of Scots
In Mary Queen of Scots, Saoirse Ronan is wearing asymmetric earrings, which were non-existent in sixteenth-century Scotland.
In your opinion, do you think such mistakes are serious or no big deal?
Preview photo credit A Dangerous Method / Recorded Picture Company
Leave a Reply